Why Do Managers Create Low Morale? Or Does My Bum Look Big In This?
Why do managers create low morale as a product of their management and what can we do about it? The answer to the initial question is easy. We all know what managers do to the workforce that causes the workforce to feel the way they do about their jobs. The managers never listen to the workforce, they never give the workforce any respect, they don't value the workforce and they spend their time "managing" by telling people what to do. The much harder question is "What can we do about it?" It is first necessary to understand the logic of why the manager creates low morale? Low morale is not a situation that the manager wants. The manager knows that low morale has a destructive effect on performance, he knows that discontent causes employees to leave and he knows how expensive it is to recruit and train replacements, yet he still behaves in the same way that produces the same environment for his workforce that causes these problems. We can only assume that the manager, for whom morale is a problem, does not know how to manage people. This may seem to be a criticism but in actual fact, of all the time spent training people to manage, almost the whole of that time is spent training them to manage inanimate things. Inventory, Process, Law, Data, Statistics, Strategy, Planning, Legislation etc. Very little, if any, time is spent teaching managers how to manage people. If managers have never been taught how to manage people we can't criticise them for creating low morale when they try. A popular tactic for people who don't know how to do something is to frighten other people so that their level of ability will not be questioned. In this way the manager builds a defence to ensure that his behaviour cannot be criticised. He deliberately makes people afraid to communicate with him to protect the illusion that he knows what he is doing. His behaviour creates a defensive position behind which he sits and which distorts his view of reality in such a way that it reinforces his belief that he is a good manager. His belief in himself, that he is a good manager, means that the morale problem must therefore be coming from somewhere else. If we were able to show the Manager the real effect of what he does to the workforce then his perception of his role and his behaviour would change dramatically. In order for the manager to understand the effect of what he does to the workforce it is necessary for him first to understand the way the workforce see themselves and how the way they see themselves differs from the way that the manager behaves towards them. There is a huge disconnect between how people see themselves and the treatment they have to put up with at work. There are 6 Billion people on this planet and It is safe to suggest that very few of them, when asked, Are you an individual? Would answer, No! And yet this is how they are treated at work. Nobody listens to their ideas, nobody values their opinions, and nobody gives them any recognition. The manager may not perceive his behaviour in this way, because he thinks he is a good manager, but his is the behaviour that we exhibit towards worthless things. It makes the workforce feel worthless to be treated this way. It is impossible for the workforce to tolerate this behaviour from management because it conflicts with their own view of themselves.
The workforce know that they are all valuable individuals. The only way that the workforce can deal with managers who treat them in this way is to disengage and ignore their behaviour. In the workplace this is seen as being Sullen, Uncommunicative, having a Poor Attitude,
Low Morale or Apathy. Knowing why the workforce feels this way allows us to understand that the "Low Morale" is not a function of the workforce, it is instead a function of the way that the workforce is treated by their manager. To change the way that the workforce feels about what they do we have to change the environment that they work in. Their working environment is created by the way their managers behave towards them. To change the working environment we have to change the way that the managers behave towards the workforce. To do that the managers have to be able to see the consequences of what they do. But how can they do that? If a good manager asks his workforce for their opinion of him he will receive their expressions of approval and be satisfied that he is doing a good job. If a bad manager asks his workforce for their opinion then he too will receive their expressions of approval because as we all know, the best way to get a bad manager off your back is to agree with him. The problem for the manager is how to find out if he is good, and adding value to the organisation, or if he is bad, interfering and preventing the workforce from performing tasks that they are perfectly capable of doing well on their own. To get honest feedback we have to be able to look in the mirror. The problem the manager faces is that his own behaviour distorts the reflection away from the true one towards the one that the workforce thinks he wants to see. If a manager asks his workforce what they think of him the answer will be coloured by the fact that the manager is the person who decides wage increases, promotions and allocation of work. The employee is going to find it very difficult to tell the boss something that the boss does not want to hear. The responsibility therefore lies with the manager to create the environment in which the employees can provide a true reflection This requires an understanding of what behaviour the Manager exhibits that stops the employee providing a true reflection and the discipline to once having identified this behaviour, to stop doing it. What is the required answer to the question, Does my bum look big in this? And what is the real answer. The behaviour of the person asking the question determines the answer they get, not whether it is the right answer or not. The behaviour of the manager towards his workforce determines whether the workforce tell him the truth or not. The soft skills that enable the manager to behave in a way that allows him to hear the truth are the key skills for a manager. While the manager remains unaware of these soft skills there is only a remote possibility of his discovering how to manage effectively. Peter A Hunter
Author of "Breaking the Mould"
http://www.breakingthemould.co.uk If you have ever experienced or learnt something which you then knew was instinctively right - you will never have forgotten it.
Peter Hunter leant something years ago which, regrettably, most of us have still yet to learn.
When we do - once we have understood the simplicity of his book 'Breaking the Mould' - it will transform our lives forever!
? Business Workout.
Related News
|
 |
|
|
RELATED ARTICLES
Document management : A dream of paperless office
What is document management: When we think about "Document Management" we usually see a picture of paperless office. It is not an easy task to make an office paperless due to several existing problems based on Industrial needs. Even it is very much difficult to make a shop paperless using document management. Document management is about to manage the document in such a way so that it can be within our reach whenever needed in the desired form without wasting extra time and space. Since computer is a wonderful device and much useful in document management.
How Managers Can Help Retain Their Best Employees
A major problem for employers today is attracting the best talent, and then retaining key employees. Research shows that the key ingredient for retention lies within the manager's ability to understand what employees really want.
Virtual Assistance: A Money Saving Opportunity For Employers
What is a Virtual Assistant? A Virtual Assistant is a highly skilled, independent entrepreneur who provides business services in a remote or virtual environment. Some have used terms like telecommuter or working from home.
Micromanagement and Delegation
Micro-Management and Delegation
Recently I had a long discussion with a friend of mine about Managers and managing. She is a former HR Manager for several major companies and was bemoaning the fact that training for managers has been cut back so significantly in recent years and that managers no longer receive the type of help, guidance and assistance that they received just a few short years ago. My background has been in retail and telecom. Hers was neither. Yet the same problems and issues seem to rise in every industry. Of course, this is exactly the reason that I got into coaching. Coaching allows those managers who want to improve a very personalized venue to do just that.
We went on to agree that the common pattern these days seemed to be for the department star performer to be promoted from contributor, to team leader, to manager in seemingly record time. We agreed that new managers have difficulty moving from the contributor to the manager role because no one is willing to spend the time and energy to coach them through the various hurdles that new managers and leaders face. We agreed that this lack of training never seemed to lower the expectations of the manager, just the performance.
Then we disagreed, strongly. What caused the disagreement? The
concept was micro-management. My friend explained to me that she has "coached" many employees recently and that many of them complained about one particular manager who was micro-managing them. She told me that she helps the employees understand and come to grips with "their problem". "You're not going to be able to change that manager, she explained to me, "so you've got to change the employees". She explains to them that if they are being micro-managed, there's probably a reason for it. They are probably doing something wrong. If they just identify that problem and improve, their manager will stop the micro-management. "The employees need to improve themselves. It's as simple as that."
I wish my life was as simple as that.
She acknowledges that with that many employees complaining that
it's likely the manager is the problem. But changing the manager is too much trouble, she says, so let's tell the employees it's their fault.
While it is true that it is sometimes necessary to micro-manage
people, her explanation makes little sense to me. You might micro-manage an employee if their performance is lacking. Or because the project they are working on is very high visibility and any chance of error must be minimized. But when a number of employees are complaining about the same manager micro-managing them it implies one of two things.
Either this manager:
1. Has a lot of problem employees and needs to start weeding them out, or
2. This manager does not know how to let go and properly
delegate to their staff.
Excessive micro-management is not the sign of a healthy manager.
When someone is constantly micro-managing their staff it's generally their problem, not the employees.
If you are micro-managing your staff, refusing to delegate routine, and not so routine tasks to them for completion, then you are setting yourself up for trouble. Have you ever heard yourself say, "I would delegate this to someone else, but it's just as easy to do it myself"? Or maybe you say, "This task is too complicated to delegate. I have to make sure it's done right."
If so, I hope you like your job. Because you aren't going anyplace higher. Delegation can be difficult to learn because it looks like a huge risk and a huge leap of faith. But it doesn't have to be that way. There are techniques that you can learn that will help you delegate and get you out of the detail. And you have to get out of the detail if you really want to be an executive.
What Is Business Sense?
What is the principal thing you need to succeed in your business today? Money. Sure, you need it, but it is not the main ingredient for success. People. Of course they are necessary, but having them may not guarantee success. Excellent products or services. Well, this is a must to succeed. But you may have them and still not succeed. Promotions, visibility, marketing. These factors lubricate your business activities for success. So what is the principal thing?
Success: A Wholistic Perspective
When I was growing up...way back in the 50s, a successful business person had an expensive car parked in their driveway, they had the house most could only dream of, and the beautiful wife as well. Things looked real good ... but that was rarely the whole story. They also had an ulcer, drank and smoked to handle all the stress, was often on medication and lived with endless stress symptoms. Yet by the old model, they were successful inspite of the fact that they were in big trouble on the inside. However, this was normal and accepted as the norm at that time.
The Seven Cs: Partnership Danger Signs - Conflict Becoming the Norm ? Part 2
A series of articles exploring the seven critical areas that can indicate a partnership is in trouble.
The Truth?
The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple. Oscar Wilde
Integrity... Should It Matter?
In our fast paced work culture, manned by technology savvy generation in a globally competitive environment, quality and productivity became the battle cry of corporations to stay in business. Though this is not necessarily bad, an equally important ingredient to succeed is seemingly taking the back seat.
Communication: Managements Responsibility
I've just watched, again, an episode in the Back to the Floor television series, which aired on the BBC (United Kingdom) and PBS (United States). Once more, communication turned out to be a key issue, as it often does in business stories.
Top Ten Tips About Communicating with Your Employees Effectively
Communication is the basis of who you are as a manager/leader in business. The rules are simple and the good news is that you can learn them and develop your skills...and it's quite easy! Here's the low-down on great Communication:-
Assertive Communication - 6 Tips For Effective Use
Assertive communication is the ability to express positive and negative ideas and feelings in an open, honest and direct way. It recognises our rights whilst still respecting the rights of others. It allows us to take responsibility for ourselves and our actions without judging or blaming other people. And it allows us to constructively confront and find a mutually satisfying solution where conflict exists.
Rules for Running a Meeting
As an experienced manager, I can announce without a doubt that the primary reason for lack of effectiveness in the contemporary business world is that people don't follow the rules for running a meeting.
Thousands meetings are conducted each day and most of the meeting chairmen have not even heard of the rules for running a meeting.
Therefore, the following article includes a brief description of the basic rules for running a meeting.
Treat Employees Fairly, Car Wash Entrepreneur sets Industry Standards
I believe that whether corporations expense their stock options is besides the point, especially when the stock is worthless. We have studied over the years the rift between employees and employers and we have discovered many great brand names are eventually destroyed from internal strife and friction within the company itself. Many great corporate leaders and thinkers of our era have discussed this at length. Tom Peters, consultant and author has discussed this in speeches and in many of his books. The book "Built to Last" discusses what makes and breaks great companies, from their mission statement to their employees and sense of team spirit. The late great Vince Lombardi had many comments on the subject of Team Work. Winston Churchill and General Patton, even Von Clauswitz, which both leaders had read frequently in understanding the will to win and rules of engagement, discussed the frontline and the dedication needed.
Using the Six-Sigma Methodology to Improve Wafer Fab Productivity
As a result of consolidation of operations and significantly increased production requirements, Intersil's main Fab was facing bottlenecks in supply versus demand. Intersil enlisted Tefen USA first to support identifying the Fab bottleneck, and then to develop a comprehensive roadmap for capacity and cycle time improvements. A team composed of Tefen USA and Intersil members conducted a short assessment to confirm that the Photo area was the bottleneck, and then initiated an aggressive and focused cross-functional improvement team. The improvement team combined their extensive experience in semiconductor manufacturing with the DMAIC methodology to systematically Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control the Photo performance. In the next six months after the initial assessment photo cycle time dropped by 60%, while Photo and overall Fab production increased to record levels (a 40% increase). In the following article, we will highlight how we used the Six-Sigma DMAIC approach and other tools to eliminate the bottleneck, and ultimately to control and sustain the change.
Conquering the Number One Problem in Business--Poor Communication
The Number One problem in business is poor communication: between coworkers, with clients, across functional areas, up the food chain. When I ask anyone I meet "What's the one thing that causes problems in your company?" the answer is always Communication: poor communication in relaying instructions, miscommunication because of irresponsible delivery, too little information when conveying changes in policies or procedures, not enough exchange of information when relaying new concepts or ideas.
Create Your Dashboard for Success
Driving down the road our eyes frequently scan the vital instruments on the dashboard that monitor speed, fuel level, coolant temperature, and oil pressure. The modern vehicle also has many more devices that constantly monitor various systems for fuel mixture, exhaust gasses, timing adjustment and others. If there is something amiss, sensors trigger the "check-engine" light. As long as the instruments register within their normal range the "check-engine" light stays off and we drive along confidently that we will reach our destination safely and without problems.
Deciding What to Delegate
DECIDING WHAT TO DELEGATE: Once the benefits of delegation are established and obstacles removed, the next step in the delegation process is to decide what work can and should be delegated. In general, work to be delegated should adhere to the following guidelines: - It can be handled adequately down the line. - All necessary information for decision making is also available down the line. - The work involves operational detail rather than planning or organization. - The task does not require skills unique to the manager or position. - An individual other than the manager has, or can have, direct control over the task.
Teaching Large Companies To Think Like The Little Guys
Q: I am an executive at a large company and in our industry we are seeing a trend wherein smaller companies are gaining market share at an alarming rate. Our CEO believes the reason for this is that smaller companies are more prone to innovation and more entrepreneurial than larger companies. He has instructed me to form a committee to study this trend and make recommendations on how we should deal with it. I'm an executive, not an entrepreneur. Any advice would be very much appreciated.
-- Name withheld by request
Knowledge Management - Creating a Sustainable Yellow Pages System
How can I "know who knows" None of us can personally know more than around 250 people, yet we want our companies to be smart, learning organisations where it's easy to find the right person to talk to. This is why many organisations create "yellow pages" applications, which enable employees to find and contact other staff with particular expertise and skills. However, these systems can be fraught with difficulty in their implementation, and often end up as out-of-date, glorified intranet telephone directories. This article, drawn from a best-selling knowledge management fieldbook by its author, identifies ten key steps involved in creating and sustaining a successful, employee-owned yellow pages system.
|